Before this class, I had never read or attempted to write a nature piece. I remember thinking to myself, what can I write about? My surroundings, what I think, the flowers, all of the above? After reading a variety of prose and poetry classified as nature writing, I have a better idea now than I did at the beginning of the semester. Briefly, I guess I can describe nature writing as non-fiction based on the natural world. Even though that definition is rather broad, nature writing in general seems to be even broader. In Mary Oliver’s poetry, for instance, it seemed to be more about observation whereas with Janisse Ray’s Ecology of a Cracker Childhood it’s about how an environment defines who we are. Then with Gretel Ehrlich in Solace of Open Spaces it’s about how nature can offer peace of mind and inspiration and how the writing itself can capture the essence of a specific place.
I still feel that I have a lot to learn about nature writing. Because of the variety we have read, I have more questions now about what can be considered nature writing and how I should approach the matter. During my weekly place blogs, I tend to just describe what I see and what’s running through my head at the time. However, I didn’t receive much insight from others and cannot offer much insight in return because I’m not sure exactly what a nature blog should be like. In the future, as Sheryl mentioned in class, I think one blog entry per week would be an excellent idea. The writer could have more time to focus on one entry and shape it into a stronger nature piece. Simultaneously the reader could have more time available to comment and help the writer improve their skills. All in all, a win-win situation.
One class requirement that I am grateful for is the chance to workshop a final essay. When I’m learning a new genre, I desperately need reader comments. I can’t say that I’ve written much non-fiction let alone nature writing. So I’m glad that I have the opportunity to revise because I learn more through revision.
Even though I still have a lot to learn about nature writing, so far what I have taken away from this class is the benefit of creating a strong sense of place. Before, I simply thought about trying to include enough details to make the reader “see” my setting. Now, though, I have begun to think in terms of creating not just a setting but a place. Gretel Ehrlich accomplished this task best, I think, in Solace of Open Spaces because, as I mentioned before, she captured the essence of Wyoming. As a result of her descriptions, I felt as if I understood her characters better because I could envision the landscape and know how it affected people’s daily lives. When I start my thesis next semester, I want to apply what I have learned about place and environment to upcoming short stories. I hope that I will be able to offer not only interesting dialogue and plot, but a strong sense of place which has been a relatively weak component in my previous work.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Thanks for your feedback, Louise. It is much appreciated.
ReplyDelete